Holste Says... |
 |
If you assume that the physical returns processing area is the only place you need to make improvements, you may be missing an opportunity to lower cost and improve service at all levels of the process. |
 |
What do you say? |
 |
Click here to send us your comments |
|
|
|
Therefore, real opportunities for improvement may exist in operations upstream from the DC. And, in fact better communications between departments can lead to great improvements in efficiencies such as faster response times and more accurate sales forecasting.
Another example is a type of assumption where the suggested problem is understood as being the real problem. It’s this type of assumption that is most dangerous. It’s where decisions are made based on erroneous facts.
Let’s say the assumption is that order fulfillment takes too long because the packing area is inefficient. Is this really the problem? If, say, you have six packing stations, each equipped with a hand-held scanner to verify the shipment. Perhaps, hands-free fixed-location or wearable scanners might improve operations. But, could the process be improved more dramatically by scanning and verifying the shipment as it’s picked directly into the shipping container? In some applications, this could eliminate as much as 50 percent of the activity in packing and could significantly streamline order fulfillment. It might even allow you to assign some of your packers to picking.
If you accept the assumption that the problem is in the packing operation alone, you miss the opportunity for making broader improvements.
Take another example – “returns”, which in many companies can be a significant cost factor. Here the assumption might be that you need to streamline returns by allowing customers to use the Internet to generate return labels complete with bar codes (or including them in the shipment). It’s true that scanning these bar codes can facilitate returning material to stock, adjusting inventory, or directing returns to an appropriate processing area in the case of defects or damage.
But, if that data isn’t available to be shared with Accounting, Sales and Marketing, it’s not being used completely or to its full potential benefit. Whether the data is shared upon receipt of the returned item or taken directly from the Internet depends on how the company operates. The point is - if you assume that the physical returns processing area is the only place you need to make improvements, you may be missing an opportunity to lower cost and improve service at all levels of the process.
Final Thoughts
The danger in accepting assumptions as fact is that it instantly narrows your vision and that can be costly. Working on solving surface issues, instead of the actual underlining problem, is akin to spinning your wheel – it will generate some heat and noise, but not much traction. But worse yet it could lead to bad decision which could just exacerbate the situation.
Any reaction to this Expert Insight column? Send below.
Your Comments/Feedback
|