Holste Says... |
 |
Many of today’s automation technologies save large amounts of time and money through the elimination of redundant, overlapping or repetitive activities. These benefits are the result of taking an integrated approach to planning and designing the material handling system. |
 |
What do you say? |
 |
Click here to send us your comments |
|
|
|
Although accounting methods vary from company to company, as it relates to DC automation projects, the Payback Method is the method most commonly used for calculating Return-On-Investment (ROI). Using this method the project is paid for out of labor savings. So, for example, if an automation project can reduce headcount by 10 people (5 per shift in a two shift operation), costing the company an average of $45,000 ea. per year (including benefits), then the project will produce an annual labor savings of $450,000. If the company’s payback period for capital expenditures is based on 3 years, a project costing $1,350,000 can be justified on labor savings alone.
Likewise, if more volume can be processed at a lower per piece handing cost, and/or the payback period can be extended, a larger investment can be made. By looking at the project from its potential labor saving prospect, a company can begin to understand what it can justify.
Many of today’s automation technologies save large amounts of time and money through the elimination of redundant, overlapping or repetitive activities. These benefits are the result of taking an integrated approach to planning and designing the material handling system. In other words – a WMS and/or integrated material handling system does not standalone. They have a strategic impact that increases overall performance.
The following chart lists important soft or intangible benefits, along with a suggested metric that system planners can use when evaluating and justifying an automated integrated system project.
Strategic Benefits of Automation
Benefit: |
Suggested Potential Metric: |
Ability to respond to fluctuations in demand |
The maximum level of throughput that can be achieved in the short run. |
Ease of data acquisition |
Time to acquire data |
Improved ability to meet shipping dates |
The percentage of on-time deliveries |
Improved company image to customers |
Ascending or descending customer inquiries and orders for goods and services |
Improved cost tracking |
Level of confidence that the companies cost numbers are correct |
Automated information conversion |
Accumulative time spent by analysis retrieving data |
New product introduction |
Time measured in months or weeks |
Reduced software upkeep (maintenance) |
Historical costs |
Reduced production lead-time |
Lead-time associated with an order |
Reduced business risk |
Competitive ranking in marketplace |
Reduce market risk |
Cost of making operational changes associated with changes to customer order profiles |
Improved space utilization |
Cost of expansion or building a new facility |
Reduced setup times |
The percentage reduction in set up for VAS |
Improved communications |
Sales forecasting speed and accuracy |
Value of real-time information |
Value of reducing incomplete shipments and processing backorders |
Improved safety |
Worker satisfaction with the working environment and reduction in lost time accidents |
Less congested work areas or Quality of Working Life (QWL) |
Positive worker response |
Less product damage |
Reduced opportunities for product damage |
Improved inventory security |
Degree to which inventory can be accessed by unauthorized people |
Improved inventory accuracy |
Accumulative cost of stock-outs and shipping errors |
Improved throughput |
Cost of overtime and excess inventories |
Calculating non-quantifiable factors associated with an automation system investment is a tricky business. On the surface some of these factors appear to add to the attractiveness of an investment alternative, but in reality they may not actually add to the financial worth unless one considers the long-term strategic implication.
The Material Handling Industry of America (MHIA), which is the trade association that produces the ProMat & Modex trade shows www.mhia.org, has developed a user-friendly software decision support method called JUSTMAT® “Justifying Material Handling Investments” which can assist with the evaluation of benefits that go beyond the traditional accounting methods. If interested go to the above websites Learning Center and under Keywords enter Justmat. Of course many of the leading industry consulting firms can assist with calculating the benefits derived from a material handling investments and recommend how best to justify them.
Another important consideration a company should give some considerable thought to in the planning stage, has to do with managing the business while implementing an automation project. Obviously, the company must continue to pick and ship orders while the new system is being installed. This requires careful and meticulous planning. If the business experiences seasonal peak periods, the project implementation schedule may need to be adjusted to minimize disruptions during those periods. This may affect how long it will take to complete the project, which could have further cost and sales implications.
The risk of inconveniencing customers during the critical installation and switchover period is real, especially if something unplanned for happens (Murphy’s Law). Therefore, the company needs to evaluate the risks and develop a strategy for managing the unexpected. This may include building backup inventory at an off-site location.
In any event, explaining to your customers what you are planning, the projects expected benefits for them and the company, and keeping them informed on how the project is progressing may help to alleviate some of their concerns.
Next week we will discuss how advances in computer simulation technologies can improve the planning, design and implementation of automated systems while lowering risk.
Final Thoughts
When it comes to material handling automation projects, the more upfront operational planning and project cost justification analysis a company does the better prepared it will be to expeditiously move forward, thus avoiding a false start and the unfortunate project killing consequences that can have.
Any reaction to this Expert Insight column? Send below.
Your Comments/Feedback
|