There is no shortage of excitement around artificial intelligence in supply chain planning. AI-powered forecasting, demand sensing, advanced analytics and automation promise to help companies make better decisions faster. And, in many cases, they can.
But there is an important distinction that is sometimes lost in the excitement: implementing AI is not the same thing as transforming a planning process.
Technology can provide extraordinary capabilities. But it does not inherently understand how a business operates, why a particular planning process exists, which data can be trusted or what needs to change inside the organization for a new capability to deliver lasting value.
That is where industry expertise becomes critical.
The first step in adopting AI should not be asking, "Where can we use AI?" It should be asking, "What business problem are we trying to solve?"
Companies can easily become a hammer looking for a nail. Instead, they should first identify a gap in capability or a business problem that needs to be addressed and then determine whether AI – or another technology – is the right tool to close that gap.
When AI is the right answer, one of its greatest advantages is speed. It can help organizations implement new capabilities, embed them into existing processes and deliver value faster. It can also connect functions, processes and systems that historically operated independently, creating a level of transparency and insight that was difficult to achieve before.
But increased visibility can create its own organizational challenge. When people have spent years working within functional silos, suddenly making information transparent across the organization can change how decisions are made. That requires more than software. It requires people who understand the business and can help an organization adapt.
Data is another critical piece of the equation.
Every supply chain organization has data challenges. AI and advanced planning solutions cannot simply compensate for poor data and still be expected to deliver their full potential. The answer does not necessarily require a massive data-cleanup project or a new data lake. Often, the more important question is understanding where the problems actually are and which data issues matter most to the business outcome.
One common problem is missing attribution.
If a company wants to understand how different types of product launches perform, for example, it needs to be able to distinguish between different types of launches. A line extension, a major innovation and a regulatory-driven change may all look like "new products" in a dataset, but they can behave very differently in the market.
Without that context, an AI model may be comparing apples to oranges.
Industry experts can help identify those distinctions because they understand not only what the data says, but what the business was actually doing when the data was created.
That expertise is equally important after implementation.
Fixing data once is not enough. Processes need to be established to govern that data and keep it accurate and useful over time. Otherwise, an organization can find itself back in the same situation a year or two later.
The same principle applies to AI itself. Organizations need people who can challenge an output when it doesn't look right and determine whether the problem is the model, the data, a missing business assumption or something else entirely. Trust in AI is built through experience, validation and learning, not simply by turning the technology on.
Ultimately, the companies that get the most value from AI will not necessarily be the ones with the most sophisticated technology. They will be the ones that understand how technology, data, processes and people have to work together.
The real opportunity isn't simply to automate what companies already do. It is to rethink how planning should work when better information, better analytics and AI-powered capabilities become available.
That requires technology.
But it also requires people who understand the business well enough to know what should change, why it should change and how to make the change stick.
AI may be the engine. Industry expertise is what helps point it in the right direction.
Any reaction to this Expert Insight column? Send feedback below.
Your Comments/Feedback
|
