SEARCH searchBY TOPIC
right_division Green SCM Distribution
Bookmark us
sitemap
SCDigest Logo
distribution

Focus: Distribution/Materials Handling

Feature Article from Our Distribution and Materials Handling Subject Area - See All

From SCDigest's On-Target E-Magazine

- Oct. 9, 2012 -

 
Logistics News: Our Review of the Annual Third Party Logistics Study


Those Planning More Outsourcing Almost Triple Percent Favoring Taking More Work Back in House; 3PL IT Gap Continues

 

SCDigest Editorial Staff


As always the annual third-party logistics (3PL) study was released last week at the annual CSCMP conference in Atlanta, an effort led for the 17th consecutive year by Dr. John Langley of Penn State University, with support from Capgemini, Panalpina, eyefortransport, and Korn/Ferry International.

SCDigest Says:

start
The report notes that "It's possible that 3PLs are not fully informing shippers about their IT capabilities. However, it is more likely that shippers are seeing what they have and finding it lacking."
close
What Do You Say?
Click Here to Send Us Your Comments
feedback
Click Here to Post or See Reader Feedback

The dataset grew this year to more than 2000 responses from shippers (both 3PL users and non-users) and 3PLs, with the data being collected earlier this year. We summarize key findings below.

The 3PL industry had a robust year globally in 2011, with total revenues up 13.7% to $616 billion from $541 billion in 2010. In North America, growth was slower at 7.2%, while spending on 3PLs soared 43% in Latin America, according to numbers cited in the report compiled by Armstrong & Associates.

The study data supports anecdotal evidence that use of outsourcing for logistics is increasing, with 65% of shipper respondents saying they are increasing their level of existing outsourcing (about the same as the past two years of the study), versus just 22% saying they are bringing more logistics activities back in house. What is interesting is that 3PLs themselves see higher levels of insourcing, with 37% saying they are seeing more shippers bring work back internally.

Again supporting anecdotal evidence, the survey also found 58% of shippers globally are trying to reduce and consolidate the number of 3PLs they use. A specific figure for North America was not broken out.

In general, satisfaction on both sides of the relationship is high, with 86% of shippers and 94% of 3PLs saying that their outsourced relationships are generally satisfactory, though we might note that "generally satisfied" does not imply shippers and/or 3PLs don't see a lot of room for improvement.

We will note that also a the conference, the general manager of the Dell Outlet business unit was finding great stress in a traditional 3PL arrangement, eventually moving to a "vest outsourcing" approach and achieving big results. That story soon on these page.

Along the same lines, just 63% of 3PLs are satisfied with the openness, transparency and communications in their relationships with shippers, versus 71% of shippers who feel that way.

And shipper satisfaction with the technology capabilities with of 3PLs is still somewhat wanting, with three straight years of satisfaction levels of just about 53%, though that is a big jump from levels seen in 2009 and before. (See graphic below.)

 

 

Source: 3PL Study 2013


This despite the fact that many 3PLs have made significant investments in technology in recent years, and certainly among the larger providers often if not usually have access to the same sorts of leading commercial packages as have been deployed by shippers.

So why the gap? That is not clear. The report notes that "It's possible that 3PLs are not fully informing shippers about their IT capabilities. However, it is more likely that shippers are seeing what they have and finding it lacking."



(Distribution/Materials Handling Story Continues Below )

CATEGORY SPONSOR: LONGBOW ADVANTAGE - JDA SUPPLY CHAIN CONSULTANTS

Download Longbow Advantage

Business Briefs

 

 

The Keys to WMS Success,

Maximizing JDA WMS

Performance and More

 

 

 

 

 

We would suggest a third option, which is that 3PLs have acquired leading packages but are not in many cases expert in their deployment, and their front end representatives are not good at really articulating what they can do.

We couldn't find the data that indicated what percent of shippers did not use any 3PL services, but did find the chart below interesting, which lists the percent of non-3PL user respondents to select or not a number of potential factors driving their decision not to outsource (e.g., logistics is a core competency, they would not expect lower costs, etc.)

 


As can be clearly seen, the percentage of non-3PL users selecting each factor has dropped substantially over the past few years. For example, those respondents choosing "logistics is a core competency" has dropped from 38% in 2006 to just 15% for this report, and that pattern holds true for most of the factors.

In addition, no factor was selected by more than 15% of respondents. Together, these two facts seem very strange, as non-3PL users, it appears, don't have strong reasons for not outsourcing.

Non-3PL users "seem to be conceding that 3PLs have improved - but still feel they can do it better," the report says.

The second half of the report covers more strategic issues, such as innovtion and risk mitigation in an outsourced relationship.  We will cover those issues next week in part 2 of this report.

The web site www.3plstudy.com has not been updated with the 2013 report, and it is not clear if it will be. However, an electronic copy of the report can be found at the Capgemini web site: 2013 3PL Report.

Any surprise to this year's 3PL study findings? Do you think shippers are right to be dissatisfied with 3PL IT capabilities? What are your reasons for not outsourcing? Let us know your thoughts at the Feedback button below.




Recent Feedback

 

No Feedback on this article yet

 

 
.