SEARCH searchBY TOPIC
right_division Green SCM Distribution
Bookmark us
sitemap
SCDigest Logo
distribution

Focus: Supply Chain Trends/Issues

Feature Article from Our Supply Chain Trends and Issues Subject Area - See All

From SCDigest's On-Target E-Magazine

 

July 27, 2011

 
Supply Chain News: Inventory Performance by Industry 2005 to 2010

 

Days Inventory Outstanding Numbers not Very Good over Past Six Years; Real Progress Seen in Restaurant Chains, Multi-Line Retail and Chemical Companies

 

SCDigest Editorial Staff

 

Last week, SCDigest editor Dan Gilmore again analyzed the annual working capital scorecard data from Hackett Group/REL, focusing as always on the Days Inventory Outstanding (DIO) component of corporate working capital performance (the other two are Days Sales Outstanding (how fast a company gets paid by its customers) and Days Payable Outstanding (how fast - or slow - a companies pays its suppliers).  See Inventory Performance 2011.

SCDigest Says:

start

Restaurant chains, multi-line retail chains,and chemical companies seemed to make true and consitent progress in reducing inventory levels over the six-year analysis horizon.

close
What Do You Say?
Click Here to Send Us Your Comments
feedback
Click Here to See Reader Feedback

In that column, we primarily focused on changes in DIO from 2009 to 2010 (the REL data for 2011 is based on 2010 fiscal year financial reporting for public companies. As noted in Gilmore's column, this year SCDigest did some work to make the industry sectors a bit more consistent from how most would look at supply chain data, and also for the first time used average DIO to assess performance in each industry sector, rather than the median totals REL reports.

The REL study defines Days Inventory Outstanding as hoiw many days of sales the company is holding in inventory, and which it defines as:

End of Year Inventory Level/[total revenue/365]

As such, it is sort of the reverse of inventory turns, in that a higher DIO, all things being equal, means poorer inventory management performance, while a lower number signals improvement.

We published a graphic showing the year over year changes in DIO across some three dozen industries, which readers can find here: 2010 Days Inventory Outstanding Performance. We will note there a couple of changes in this chart versus the original data due to some spreadsheet errors on our part, now corrected. The changes can be found in the following sectors: Communications Equipment, Catalog and Internet Retailers, and Restaurants.

We took that analysis a step further this week, and looked at DIO performance across these same sectors from 2005 through 2010, the scope of the REL data.

The results are very interesting, and are displayed in the graphic below.It lists each sector we analyzed, the number of companies in the sector, example companies in the group (or all companies if four or less in the sector), the companies with the lowest and highest DIO figures for 2010, average DIO totals for 2005 to 2010 for each sector (in reverse order), and finally the change for the sector from 2005 to 2010.

 

This graphic is also available here as a pdf document.

 

(Supply Chain Trends Story Continued Below)

CATEGORY SPONSOR: SOFTEON

Learn More about Softeon's Innovative Supply Chain Solutions

 

Here are our observations from this data:

  • 12 of the 40 industry sectors we reviewed decreased DIO 3% or more in 2010 from the 2005 totals
  • 11 sectors saw basically flat DIO changes of +/- less than 3%
  • 17 sectors saw DIO increase 3% or more  over the period.
  • There can be some aberations in the data. For example, the top improvement number among sectors over the period was the average 57.8% decrease in DIO in the personal care products category. However, the 2005 number was artificially high based on a very hgh number from Alberto-Culver, which in turn was probably the result of some accounting peculiarity.
  • Restaurant chains, multi-line retail chains,and chemical companies seemed to make true and consitent progress in reducing inventory levels over the six-year analysis horizon.
  • Conversely, among the sectors showing 3% or greater increases DIO over the period, most were up and down over the six years, not showing any particular pattern. The one exception is Aerospace and Defense, where there is a progressive increase in DIO over the period, for reasons not immediately clear. One possible reason is that the US Dept. of Defense in recent years has asked major suppliers to take on more direct responsibility for spares management, and perhaps that has affected the numbers.
  • We are surprised the food manufacturing sector hasn't seen more progress over the period, given the focus on inventory reduction in that industry in recent years.

 

The bottom line is that few sectors have made real progress since 2005, for reasons that are not readily apparent. The sharp rise in oil prices during this time could be one factor, as companies decided to trade off more inventory to reduce transport costs.

Many also point to the impact of offshoring, saying that flat inventory performance in the face of much longer supply chains is actually an accomplishment.

Maybe so, but we think this overall performance needs further investigation. Are we making inventory progress or not?

What is your reaction or analysis of these DIO numbers? Anything stand out to you? Are we treading water in inventory performance or not? Let us know your thoughts at the Feedback button below.


ur feedback
shadow

Recent Feedback

 

No Feedback on this article yet

 

 
.