SEARCH searchBY TOPIC
right_division Green SCM Distribution
Bookmark us
sitemap
SCDigest Logo
distribution

Focus: Distribution/Materials Handling

Feature Article from Our Distribution and Materials Handling Subject Area - See All

From SCDigest's On-Target E-Magazine

- April 4, 2012 -

 
Logistics News: Holste on Sortation Systems in Distribution


When Sortation Systems Go Wrong, Usually Due to Insufficient Upfront Planning, Holste Says, Though Outright Disasters Very Rare Today

 

SCDigest Editorial Staff


SCDigest editor Dan Gilmore sat down to discuss issues related to sortation systems in distribution with our Materials Handling Editor Cliff Holste, an engineer with more than 30 years in the business, with much of it devoted to sortation systems and projects, in which he is still actively involved.

In fact, he was involved in the development of the first commercially available sortation system.

SCDigest Says:

start
The quality of sorting equipment, scanners, PC/PLC controls, and conveyor system design being offered today is at its highest level. It's rare to hear a horror story anymore.
close
What Do You Say?
Click Here to Send Us Your Comments
feedback
Click Here to Post or See Reader Feedback

Below, he shares his insight.

Gilmore: What are some of the first things a company that decides they need a sortation needs to consider?

Holste: I think there are a number of issues that need to be considered at the outset. For example:

  • Is manual sorting (utilizing a re-circulating conveyor loop) a possibility, or does capacity/operational requirements dedicate automatic sortation?

 

  • If automation is required, are the cartons conveyable and do they contain an individual bar code?

 

  • Do you have the internal resources to develop the plans and specifications, and handle the purchasing and project management phase of the project or will you need to obtain outside assistance?

 

  • When you include the cost of the various sub-systems that are required to feed and takeaway product to and from an automatic sorter, even the most basic entry level system will require an investment approaching $750,000 to a million dollars or more. It can go up into the multiple millions from there. Therefore, a project budget must be established and justified early on.

 

  • Determine system capacity requirements - what will the sorter handle and at what rate.

 

  • Develop a system concept, which should include a general arrangement layout and operations plan.

 

  • Develop a comprehensive changeover plan that includes operational changes, facility modifications, and re-training of management and staff.

Gilmore: When you've seen companies not get their sorting projects right, what are main reasons things that went wrong?

Holste: In situations where system performance is poor, it is generally due to insufficient overall system planning in the concepting and budgeting phase, which can then lead to overlooking important functions and requirements. For instance, in an automated sorting system accurate and timely replenishment of active inventory is critical to maintaining sorting system performance and customer service levels. If you don't get that right, which is outside of the sortation system itself, sorter system performance will suffer or even be considered a failure.

Another example of poor planning might be in failing to appropriately design in after-sort handling and shipping capacity, which can then lead to excessive system backups and shutdowns.

Gilmore: Some companies worry that a sortation system won't be flexible enough to meet future needs, as conditions change. What are the keys to designing a system that has enough flexibility?

Holste: There are several types of sorters available covering a wide range of incremental capacities. Before selecting a sorter, determine what your current capacity requirements are then add for growth. The sorter may run initially at a speed well below its maximum design speed and then be increased as throughput demand increases.

A typical sorter, operating single shift with normal preventative maintenance, will last 10 to 15 years, and even then it can be refurbished and/or reused in a new location.

Be sure that the system layout allows for expansion to the picking system (by increasing the picking locations and/or number of pick modules) and the shipping system (by adding more sort locations). However, special attention needs to be given to the location of the sorter induction area as this is often the most complex part of the system and its location should be considered permanent.

Understand how changes in products, SKU mix, order profiles, and customer demands for value added services will affect the future system operations. Have a plan or strategy worked out for dealing with them before finalizing the system layout.

Also note that in recent years, conveyor manufacturers have made a number of improvements in their designs to increase system flexibility over time - this is a very good thing.

[See our Material Handling Tech Note: Advances in Conveyor Technology Increases System Flexibility]

(Distribution/Materials Handling Story Continues Below )

CATEGORY SPONSOR: LONGBOW ADVANTAGE - JDA SUPPLY CHAIN CONSULTANTS

Download Longbow Advantage

Business Briefs

 

 

The Keys to WMS Success,

Maximizing JDA WMS

Performance and More

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gilmore: I know it varies, but at a high level, what sort of throughput improvements do companies typically achieve when moving to automated sortation?

Holste: If a non-automated distribution center is picking and shipping 10,000 cases in 8 hours, which is about the minimum required to justify automatic sortation, and they install even the lowest level pop-up belt sorter, they can expect a yield of 20,000 cases in 8 hours. The next step-up in automated sorter capacity will get you into the 40,000 to 50,000 case range. My best guess is that an increase in throughput capacity of 2 to 3 times would be typical while providing a reasonable ROI.

 

Gilmore: If you had to offer a few words of advice for companies investigating whether sortation was right for them, what would it be?

Holste: The quality of sorting equipment, scanners, PC/PLC controls, and conveyor system design being offered today is at its highest level. It's rare to hear a horror story anymore. Standardization of equipment design and decades of industry experience have virtually eliminated trial and error methods. No matter how unique and specialized your operation may be, the chances are very good that there is a company (probably a competitor) doing something very similar and already enjoying the benefits of automated sorting.

That being said, there is no "out-of-the-box" approach to sorting system design. The proper, most cost effective system solution for your operation will evolve from a thorough analysis of your business data and specific distribution requirements. Shortcutting this crucial planning process could result in not being able to receive the full potential from your investment.

Gilmore: Do you ever see sort systems these days where every carton is not uniquely identified going onto the sorter? Getting that done can be a big process challenge for some companies.

Holste: This kind of sorting application is found mostly in manufacturing operations. Automatic sorting is performed based on container size characteristics, or weight, or color, or some combination thereof.

Another possibility would be where several pallet loads (or full containers) of a single SKU are inducted onto the sorter and individual case/item distribution is predetermined based on a lookup table. A well known men's clothier uses this method to sort lot size quantities of each SKU to its retail stores.

 

Any reaction to Holste's thoughts on sortation systems? What would you add? Let us know your thoughts in the Feedback section below.


Recent Feedback

 

No Feedback on this article yet

 

 
.