I think US manufacturers need to make even greater efforts in this regard. It’s just one person’s opinion, but a few years ago I was told by a Project Manager of a well known home shopping-type retailer that their new EVP of Global Logistics and Distribution considered USA manufactured MHE equipment as being “inferior” to European standards. While the PM made it clear that he did not necessarily agree with this assessment, that executive was not alone in that opinion.
Today, foreign vendors make up a significant and growing segment of the MHE industry. Two of the largest system providers in the US are owned by foreign corporations: Dematic and FKI Logistex. There are many other foreign corporations operating directly here, such as Beumer, Daifuku, Eurosort, Knapp, Schaefer, Vanderlande, and Swisslog, just to mention a few.
Take a look over your shoulder and you will also see that the Chinese are coming. While they don’t have their act together from a marketing/sales perspective yet, they will be persistent and likely will have a big advantage in equipment costs. That will appeal to some segments of the market, even if the offerings are lacking in other areas.
As Bruce Bleikamp of Peach State Integrated Technologies commented in a letter on the consolidation article and prospect of one major merger soon, “While on the one hand, there may be one less manufacturer, companies purchasing automated material handling systems have even more sources to consider,” he wrote, referring not only to foreign entrants, but the rise of material handling systems integrators over the past few years.
US domestic manufacturers will have to continue to meet this foreign competitive challenge – and some will “bulk up” through mergers in response. While not all of these domestic and foreign MHE providers are “thriving,” the fact that the US market can support all of them at one level or another really says something.
In the end, this is a good thing for buyers - and for those manufacturers which can adapt.
|