SEARCH searchBY TOPIC
right_division Green SCM Distribution
Bookmark us
sitemap
SCDigest Logo
distribution

Focus: Manufacturing

Feature Article from Our Manufacturing Subject Area - See All

From SCDigest's On-Target E-Magazine

- June 4, 2014 -

 
Supply Chain News: SCDigest, MIT Supply Chain Forum Again Partner on Study to Gauge Extent of US Reshoring Trend

 

2012 Study Showed Reasonably Strong Plans to Keep or Return Production Work to US - How Has Dynamic Changed Over the Past Two Years?

 

SCDigest Editorial Staff

 

In 2012, Supply Chain Digest and the MIT Supply Chain Forum, led by Dr. David Simchi-Levi, conducted what we believe is the largest single study of trends around what been termed "reshoring," or bringing back manufacturing to the US from offshore locations.

SCDigest Says:

start

Another key issue to watch is that some production returning from Asia is not going to US soil but rather Mexico or the Caribbean.

close
What Do You Say?
Click Here to Send Us Your Comments
feedback
Click Here to See Reader Feedback

That study effort is being repeated here in 2014. You can help by taking the 10-minute survey, regardless of whether your company is planning any reshoring or not:

 

1. If you PARTICIPATED and COMPLETED the 2012 Re-shoring Survey, please use this link:

https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/2012Respondent


2. If you did NOT participate in the 2012 Re-shoring survey, please use this link:

https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/2014MfgSurvey

 

The original study was launched in part due to the growing level of anecdotal evidence that firms were indeed either keeping manufacturing in the US versus moving offshore, or bringing some production back. Companies such as Caterpillar, GE, Whirlpool, NCR and others had made news by announcing such reshoring decisions in the preceding couple of years.

The 2012 report found that 33.6% of respondents stated that they were "considering" bringing manufacturing back to the United States, while 15.3% of U.S. companies stated that they were "definitively" planning to reshore production work.

What were the key drivers in companies that said they were considering or definitely reshoring? The study found the following reasons (percentage who cited a given factor as an import decision driver):

• Time to Market: 73.7%

• Lower Costs: 63.9%

• Product Quality: 62.2%

• More Control: 56.8%

• Hidden Supply Chain Costs from Offshoring: 51.4%

• Protect IP: 48.5%


Results from the studu were picked up by several major business media, such as the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal. In fact, the survey is being repeated here in 2014 in part because some of those news organizations inquired recently as to whether there was any updated data.

How if at all have perceptions and plans by US companies changed in the past two years? That is what the 2014 version of the study plans to answer.

Below, you will find a sort video of SCDigest Editor Dan Gilmore and MIT's Dr. David Simchi-Levi discussing this new US manufacturing study.

Dan Gilmore and Dr. David Simchi-Levi Discuss 2014 US Manufacturing Survey

 

 

 

The results will be of key interest to policy makers, business leaders and more. Of course, one important consideration for many is what the impact on jobs will be. The US lost millions of manufacturing jobs in the decade leading up to the great Recession starting in 2008. It has gained back some 600,000 manufacturing jobs since the low point in 2010, but that is still more than 1.5 million fewer than at the start of the recession on 2007.


(Manufacturing Article Continued Below)

CATEGORY SPONSOR: SOFTEON

 
 

The anecdotal evidence is even stronger today than it was in 2012 that the reshoring phenomenon is real. There is evidence even in sectors such as apparel, which hugely went offshore over the past 20 years, that some production work is in fact headed back to the US.

Officials in Brooklyn, NY, for example, reported just last week that apparel manufacturing jobs in the borough are up 25 from 2003 to 2012. Meanwhile, we recently also reported on how Los Angeles apparel maker Karen Kane has reshored about 80% of its production from China in recent years, saying costs in China have risen, quality has deteriorated, and that domestic manufacturing provides greater supply chain agility.

But another issue to watch is that some production returning from Asia is not going to US soil but rather Mexico or the Caribbean.

"We are going to take the report this year even further, and compare what companies are saying versus what the data is showing," said SCDigest's Gilmore. "I think it this will be a really insightful bit of research, and an excellent partnership between SCDigest and MIT."

Again, please help MIT and SCDigest by taking the survey, whether you plan or any reshoring or not:

 

1. If you PARTICIPATED and COMPLETED the 2012 Re-shoring Survey, please use this link:

https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/2012Respondent


2. If you did NOT participate in the 2012 Re-shoring survey, please use this link:

https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/2014MfgSurvey



How real do you believe the US reshoring trend is? Let us know your thoughts at the Feedback section below.

Recent Feedback

 

No Feedback on this article yet

 

 
.
.