Supply chain and the flat world | Chrysler goes flexible | Supply chain planning and execution
combination | Supplier relationships | Getting projects right | Great feedback

  August 11, 2005 - SupplyChainDigest Newsletter
SupplyChainDigest - Your first stop for supply chain information

Become a Sponsor Click here for information on how to become a Sponsor
Send to a Friend Send this newsletter to a friend. Click here!
Subscribe Not already subscribed? It's free! Click here.

Archived Newsletters | Industry Events | Recruitment Corner | Expert Insight | SCD Viewpoint
SPECIAL REPORT

Improve Your Bottom Line With Procurement Best Practices!
SupplyChainDigest and IOMA bring you "Best Practices in Controlling Purchasing Costs" – a special report featuring over 70 pages of critical insight and practical ideas to reduce your procurement spend.

Regularly $179.00
only $125.00 for SCDigest readers.

Click here for more information and to order

First Thoughts by Dan Gilmore, Editor
Supply Chaining and a Flat World

I finally got around this week to reading "The World is Flat," the bestselling book by New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman. It’s one of those books that at one level doesn’t tell us anything most of us in business don’t know, but puts things together in a way that still leaves you with a brand new perspective for what’s happening in the world – and how it will impact all of us, especially in supply chain.

The basic theme of Friedman’s book is that a confluence of powerful forces has dramatically reduced barriers in most of the world to commerce, information access and flow, and communications. As a result, counties and companies have access to talent, assets and markets unimaginable just a decade ago – and an equal number of potential threats to the status quo and current business models.

What Friedman calls “supply chaining” plays a key role in this flattening. He notes how logistics providers such as UPS and FedEx are able to leverage vast global infrastructures to enable small companies to tap into global markets and customers, which in turn enables larger companies to source materials and components from these companies with increasing ease.

Wal-Mart gets almost a full chapter’s worth of attention, the theme being the ability of the retailer to flow goods from across the globe into its stores with tremendous efficiency is one component of flattening. Wal-Mart’s drive into China certainly has helped accelerate trade between the U.S. and that country, though Friedman also notes Wal-Mart had to almost beg TV manufacturer Sanyo to keep a plant in Arkansas.

There’s a lot more, but I’ll just say this; if reading this book doesn’t cause you to at least for a few moments ponder what a flat world means for your company, your supply chain and your own career, you must really be skimming the thing. And it’s clearer than ever to me that those companies (and individuals) who proactively harness the power of these changes rather than react to them (often too late) will continue to thrive and prosper, while the rest take a beating.

Everything – repeat everything - has the potential to be outsourced. “Not flipping burgers at least!” you tell me – at least in the end we can fall back on employment at Wendy’s. Except part of burger flipping is being outsourced A McDonald’s franchisee in Missouri uses high speed connections, cameras and video monitors so that an offsite “call center” in Colorado actually services customers at the four of his restaurant’s drive-thru windows. While the cost per hour of the call center personnel is actually somewhat higher than an in-store employee, productivity (cars served per hour) is up almost two-fold, while errors have been significantly reduced. As you might imagine, McDonald’s corporate is watching from Illinois, Today, Colorado. Tomorrow Bangagore?

Friedman quotes the CEO of Infosys, the Indian technology and outsourcing giant, as saying that the Internet, communication infrastructure and the like has “created a platform where intellectual work, intellectual capital, could be delivered from anywhere. It could be disaggregated, delivered, distributed, produced and put back together again…” Sort of like a Star Trek transport system on steroids.

One only has to see what the high tech companies are doing to get a sense of this, as illustrated in a 2004 article in the New York Times on Hewlett-Packard’s global supply chain for a server product: new model idea developed in Singapore, approved in Houston, concept designed back in Singapore, engineering design in Taiwan, components sourced from all over the globe, final assembly in India, Australia, Singapore and China.

Winning companies will be those that tap into this vast world of talent and resources, and can coordinate the movement of materials and information better than the competition. It offers huge opportunities for logistic and supply chain professionals – but also risk. If computer design can be outsourced, why not inventory planning? I’m out of space for now – more on this aspect next week.

Note: In last week’s First Thoughts piece on “Building a World Class DC,” an editing error led us to misspell the last name of the author of the WERC book we referenced, Ken Miesemer from Hershey Foods. It is the best book we’ve seen on the subject.

Did you read “The World is Flat?” What was your reaction? What are the opportunities - and risks – from this revolution in the global economy? Is this the best time ever to be in supply chain and logistics? Let us know your thoughts.

Let us know your thoughts.

Dan Gilmore

EXPERT INSIGHT
Doing Supply Chain Technology Projects Right

By Mark Fralick
SCDigest Technology Editor

I’ve spent a lot of my career doing supply chain technology projects, mostly in the logistics or “supply chain execution” areas. I also talk to people all the time about their experiences with supply chain projects.

nfortunately, far too many of these experiences are bad. Yes, every now and then I’ll get someone talking about a project that went particularly well. But these conversations often begin with the phrase: “But I remember this one project…”. It’s as if projects so rarely go extremely well that when one does it is somehow etched into their memory.

So why are software projects so hard to do well, especially those involving SCE and ERP deployments? ...

Click here for the full column.

SCDIGEST VIEWPOINT

The Value of Real-time Optimization in Transportation and Logistics

Guest Speaker: Erv Bluemner, Vice President - Product Marketing, RedPrairie

Play Viewpoint nowPlay Now
NEWS AND VIEWS

August 11, 2005
Chrysler to Adopt �Flexible Manufacturing� Strategy
Announces plans to build several models at each plant; catching up to the Japanese

August 11, 2005
Supply Chain Software Mergers Continue, as Manhattan Associates Acquires Evant
Notable step in long-predicted morphing of �planning� and �execution� solutions

August 11, 2005
Leveraging Value from Supplier Relationships
Treating suppliers as relationships, not just sources of goods, pays big dividends

INDUSTRY NEWS

Industry News - Click here for this week's performance details
View performance details for this past week.

SUPPLY CHAIN TRIVIA

Q. How many labor hours does it take Chrysler to make an average car (vehicle building speed)?

A. Click to find the answerbelow

Become a Certified RFID Supply Chain Manager   Procure Con 2005
YOUR FEEDBACK

Feedback is coming in at a rate greater than we can publish it – thanks for your response.

We�re still really backed up. As promised last week, we are including more letters on our piece on �What is supply chain collaboration?� which has generated about as many responses as we even had. This includes a great story as part of our feedback of the week from Ricky Harper, Director of Planning/ Supply Chain Optimization at SI Corporation. There are several other letters on this topic from some people who really know what they are talking about � we know you will enjoy, including one from Ron Ireland, who was at Wal-Mart during the early days of CPFR (termed CFAR at the time).

Keep the dialog going! Give us your thoughts on this week's Supply Chain topics.

FEEDBACK OF THE WEEK On "Supply Chain Collaboration"

You just hit the nail on the head! Our company has been collaboratively demand planning with key customers for several years. Until this year however, we were simply sharing information. We are currently in the process of implementing truly collaborative efforts with our largest customer to re-define the value chain (processes, information sharing, etc.) between us.

Culturally, our company (the supplier) struggles with wanting to share the savings opportunities. Collaboration to me means partnering to find opportunities that can be jointly leveraged. This will likely require suppliers and customers to put more skin in the game. Therefore, everyone will want, and rightfully deserve some of the rewards.

We don’t want to give away all of our profits, but we must remember that many savings opportunities can only be capitalized through joint interaction. Half of something is better than all of nothing.

Ricky Harper
Director of Planning/Supply Chain Optimization
SI Corporation

More On "Supply Chain Collaboration"

I certainly agree with you comment “I’ll contend that much of what is referred to today as collaboration is in fact simply integration, which the Internet and various other technologies are simply allowing us to do with ever increasing ease”.  I also agree that most folks don’t really collaborate at all.  They talk about it…but don’t do it.

Years ago we called it “ECR”.  But we stopped having ECR meetings when no one could figure out how they got their share of the billions of dollars of savings that the experts said was currently being wasted.

All that being said…I do believe that true collaboration is needed, and will come.  I believe in the future we will see some interesting relationships that were formed to share supply chain networks and take out costs.  Manufacturers will be using one another’s supply chains, or third party supply chains to serve their customers.  I believe this because we are having those types of discussions with several very large players.  The exact solution is not designed yet…but the want and the needs are there.  Today’s senior supply chain executives are also much more willing to be open to any ideas that can reduce waste.  Their attitudes have changed.  Not long ago (just a few years) these same managers we saying “here’s what I want you to do”.  Now they are saying “here’s my problem…what can we do?”

That is exactly the type of thinking that will lead to true collaboration.

Bob Koerner
President & CEO
Total Logistic Control

I have been receiving you newsletter for some time and always find the information worthwhile. Since you did ask, I am forwarding some thoughts on the subject of collaborative manufacturing.

Collaboration in manufacturing is not a mystery except as presented by the many vendors that jump on and abuse concepts to help sell their products. There has been substantial research on this subject including work done by Sandia Laboratories.

I have written a book titled Collaborative Manufacturing: Using Real-time Information to Support the Supply Chain, published in 2003, that identifies various forms of collaboration (CPFR is one of four) and provides background and guidelines on how to use the concepts. Books by C. Poirier, E-Supply Chain, and Michael Hammer, The Agenda, also provide substantial insight on the subject.

Collaboration (people working together) does not fit the adversarial paradigm most businesses operate under today but it is a more effective approach to business. CPFR is one idea that has been a very effective tool in the retail world to reduce stock-outs and to get retail chains in a dialogue with the product manufacturers over product schedules and delivery. Synchronizing inventories across value chains and appropriate product information sharing between suppliers are other effective approaches. There is also great value in a collaborative environment within companies where departments share information. It really is amazing what can be done when people work together rather than as adversaries.

Michael McClellan
Collaboration Synergies Inc

I worked for Wal-Mart from 1992 - 1997.  I was responsible for leading the first CFAR pilot which then lead to the development of the CPFR industry guidelines.  I am now consulting for Oliver Wight Americas and still active with the VICS CPFR Working Group.  I recently published a book title:  "Supply Chain Collaboration:  implementing CPFR and other collaborative best practices."   

I also speak quite often at conferences and was just awarded last month in South Africa at the SAPICS annual conference the "Toyota Cup for Most Innovative Idea".  You guessed it, it was on Supply Chain Collaboration.  I have been seeing Supply Chain Collaboration starting to take off again, primarily with companies outside of the Retail /  CPG space, and Internationally.  I have lead several Supply Chain Collaboration pilots using the principal guidelines of CPFR not so much to reduce inventory or labor, but primarily to reduce lead times for companies who manufacture in Asia.

I agree with you that the adoption of Supply Chain Collaborative practices vary and with different interpretations.  I often say the Supply Chain Collaboration is often looked at as VMI on Steroids.   I too get frustrated when I see companies fail at getting a true Win/Win partnership versus the more than often seen "I Win You Figure Out How to Win" mentality.   I have personally been involved with many successful Supply Chain Collaboration efforts and even though not perfect they all have had some substantial ROI's.  It is just plain old common sense.

Thanks and I enjoy reading your articles.  

Ron Ireland
Managing Principal
Oliver Wight Americas, Inc

RECRUITMENT CORNER

This week's open opportunity is:

VP of Distribution and Logistics
In the Indianapolis, IN area

Click here for the full job description.
Click here if you are an interested candidate.

(NOTE: Any inquiries will be handled with complete confidentiality.)

 
SUPPLY CHAIN TRIVIA

Q. How many labor hours does it take Chrysler to make an average car (vehicle building speed)?

A. About 35 labor hours, versus 30 for leading Japanese manufacturers.

Copyright © SupplyChainDigest™ 2003-2005. All Rights Reserved.
To unsubscribe click here.