Expert Insight: Sorting it Out
By Cliff Holste
Date: March 24, 2010

Logistics News: Material Handling System Performance May Depend On How It Is Measured

When Actual System Performance Does Not Matchup with Expected, What’s Wrong and Whose Fault Is It?

Suspected poor MH system performance is an issue that keeps many DC operations managers up at nights. They want to know why their system cannot or will not deliver the performance capacity for which it was designed.

 

Distribution Digest has posted two articles on this subject which were intended to expose how this issue can be avoided in the design stage (What is the Relationship between Material Handling System Performance and Actual ROI?) and (Is it Possible to Create Distribution Processes that Handle Both Peaks and Slower Periods Efficiently?).

 

While both articles are rich with details explaining important elements of the system design process, for those who are struggling with what they believe are currently underperforming systems, it may be beneficial to take a close look at how the performance is being measured.

 

Understanding How to Measure System Performance is Critical


Ever since engineers and analysts have been crunching numbers there’s been this old adage – “Garbage In = Garbage Out”. What they’re saying is that data (metrics) is only as good as the methods used to measure it - if something is measured or calculated the “wrong way”, the results will be wrong. As obvious as this may be, the proper way to measure is not always obvious, or may even be in dispute.

 

For instance, many DCs have issues with low daily or hourly pick rates. Often, the pick rate is being measured based on a 420 minute work period (8 hrs minus lunch and break periods). However, if due to accumulative idle time the pickers are only picking between 240 and 360 minutes per period – that would translate into low pick rates on a spreadsheet, but it is a completely inaccurate statement of system picking capacity.

 

In a recently published article on this subject, Don Savage of Diamond Phoenix, said, “It is critical that all rates are measured against the time actually worked. This makes for a more complex measurement, but it gives you a much clearer picture of the true capabilities of the existing system. It is also a good indicator of wasted or available time throughout the day.”

 

The following (3) examples, taken in part from Savage’s article, help to explain how a systems performance can change based on how it is measured.

 

1. Inconsistent Flow of Work

 

Savage points out that many DC operations are unable to provide employees with a steady flow of work, which can be a serious problem for batch picking systems. The lack of constant work could be the result of IT issues, a lack of orders in process, or even a deficient routing system for passing orders.

 

Pickers cannot pick at high rates if they don’t have enough orders. This drought in orders creates lost time, which cannot be recovered, and daily pick rates plummet.

 

The best way to track this is to measure the number of orders present in each zone throughout the day in short time increments (5-minute intervals). Although it sounds tedious, this is an exceptionally important measurement because it directly verifies the effectiveness of the order routing and starting operation. If full batches are not available on a constant basis, pick rates will not reach their maximum.

Changes should then be made to move more orders into the zones.

 

2. Organization of Operations

 

According to Savage, many operations do not organize tasks in a way that fills available time; they are pushed into a linear process instead of a concurrent one. Because a separate measurement against time is necessary for each one, the time required for each operation is usually overstated.

 

Typically, DC systems operate in sporadic bursts of work with time left over in between. It’s a kind of hurry up and wait situation. This is most common in wave picking operations and is referred to as the bell curve effect. Sometimes this can be corrected by overlapping waves. However, you can’t fill that time appropriately if you don’t know when and how long it is. So the first step is to measure this over a period of multiple days so you can see those busy versus slack time windows.

 

If wave overlapping is not an option – try filling the gaps with other tasks, which may mean combining different tasks in the same time frame (picking and replenishment, for example).

 

3. Not Accounting For Peaks

 

In this case, Savage acknowledges that it is not uncommon for an entire day’s work to get compressed into a few hours due to response commitments or shipping requirements. In this situation, he says some managers still measure their efficiency rates over an entire day rather than actual time. In addition, when more workers are assigned to picking zones they are frequently not included in the rate measurements. This leads to over or understating rates for both the day and peak times.

 

To avoid this error, Savage suggests that if work is condensed into a specific period of the day, then measure the rate for that time period and the number of people working concurrently; this gives you your maximum rate per person. You can then use that rate and the peak window to plan the rest of the operations for the day, which may mean different labor assignments during peak and slack times.

 


Consider the Performance Audit


An effective way to determine how efficiently your MH systems are running is by doing a Performance Audit. A performance audit can help you zero in on productivity drains, evaluating such areas as picking, conveying, and sorting rates. Whether you utilize internal resources or hire an industry expert, a comprehensive audit will analyze systems from both an operational and functional standpoint, including a final report detailing recommended adjustments. Thus, you will be able to pinpoint and fix inefficiencies, realizing cost savings from improved productivity rates and system performance. Distribution Digest has posted two articles that will help you get started (Distribution Center Audits – Real Value, or Marketing Exercise?) and (Guidelines for Successful Distribution Audits).


Final Thoughts


Performance and capacity are two very different measurements. Understanding your MH system’s design parameters is essential to being able to consistently obtain the best performance it can deliver.

 

We agree with Savage in that the most important rule of operations measurement is to measure everything against the actual time used for the task. This allows you to plan the working day around real time required for a task instead of reacting blindly and throwing resources against it.

Agree or disagree with Holste's perspective? What would you add? Let us know your thoughts for publication in the SCDigest newsletter Feedback section, and on the website. Upon request, comments will be posted with the respondent's name or company withheld.

You can also contact Holste directly to discuss your material handling or distribution challenges at the Feedback button below.


Send an Email
profile About the Author
Cliff Holste is Supply Chain Digest's Material Handling Editor. With more than 30 years experience in designing and implementing material handling and order picking systems in distribution, Holste has worked with dozens of large and smaller companies to improve distribution performance.
 
Visit SCDigest's New Distribution Digest web page for the best in distribution management and material handling news and insight.

Holste Says:


The most important rule of operations measurement is to measure everything against the actual time used for the task.


What Do You Say?
Click Here to Send Us Your Comments
views
 
profile Related Blogs
Sorting It Out: Shippers Looking To Increase System Capacity Are Surprised To Find It May Already Exist!

Sorting It Out: For Shippers - Benefits Of Real-Time Control In The DC Are Huge!

Sorting It Out: Shippers Looking to Improve Operations Choose Customer Centric Approach

Sorting It Out: Productivity is a Crucial Factor in Measuring Production Performance

Sorting It Out: Packaging Construction Impacts on Logistics Operations

Sorting It Out: System Providers Offering More Modular & Scalable Solutions

Sorting It Out: Business Metrics Drive Technology Adoption

Sorting It Out: Supervising in the DC - Timeless Leadership Skills and Tools First-Line Supervisors Need to be Successful

Sorting It Out: Good Business Security is All About Paying Attention to Details

Sorting It Out: Is Automation Right for Your Business

<< Previous | Next >>

See all posts
gn .