With the near complete agreement that their companies do not have high levels of planning and integration, and that there are substantial benefits – and even competitive necessity – to increase that level of integration, CSCO Insights wanted to understand what strategies respondents believed were key to getting there.
CSCO Insights offered respondents a series of choices, and asked them to rate how important each one was likely to be to better integrate planning and execution.
Perhaps not surprisingly, the top strategy (49% of respondents) for better integrating planning and execution is simply to better integrate supporting planning and execution technologies. That was followed by improving supply chain visibility (45%) and developing a more integrated view of demand (43%). (See chart below - percent indicates number of respondents who selected that strategy as a high priority.)
These results re-enforce the position that technology generally and enhanced information flow specifically is a prerequisite for improved planning and execution. While improved visibility and technology integration alone will not be sufficient for reaching new levels of integrated planning and execution, the survey consensus and our own position is that it is fundamentally a necessary component.

The key takeaway: Few companies seem to believe they have reached the level of maturity and excellence they need for better planning and execution in any area. Interestingly, however, technology related areas in general scored
somewhat higher than process-related areas
in terms of priority.
This could be viewed as
indicating the desire and foundation is there
from a people and process perspective, but the
technology tools are not yet in place.
SCDigest is Twittering!
Follow us now at https://twitter.com/scdigest |