SEARCH searchBY TOPIC
right_division Green SCM Distribution
Bookmark us
sitemap
SCDigest Logo
distribution

Focus: Distribution/Materials Handling

Feature Article from Our Distribution and Materials Handling Subject Area - See All

From SCDigest's On-Target E-Magazine

Oct. 26 , 2011

 
Logistics News: Annual Third Party Logistics Study Review and Comment Part 2


Interest in Gainsharing, Collaboration Way Down, but Could be Statistical Anomaly; Broad Agreement that Global/Local Modal for Emerging Market Outsourcing is Best

 

SCDigest Editorial Staff



Two weeks ago, SCDigest summarized some key data and insights from the 16th annual third party logistics study. The 2012 report was released as always at the annual CSCMP conference in Philadelphia. The report summarizes survey responses from more than 1600 shippers and almost 700 3PL respondents, and was led as always by Dr. John Langley of Penn State University, supported by various sponsors, such as Capgemini and recruiting firm Heidrick & Struggles . (See Annual 3PL Study Finds Little Change in Outsourcing Levels Year over Year.)

SCDigest Says:

start
Also of some note in this chart is that just 7% of respondents in North America report using a lead logistic provider/4PL (an outsourced manager of outsourcers), versus almost double (13%) in Asia.
close
What Do You Say?
Click Here to Send Us Your Comments
feedback
Click Here to See Reader Feedback

This week, part 2 of our review and comment on the 2012 report.

While a high levels of shippers (88%) and 3PLs (94%) said they are satisfied with their overall relationships with each other, those numbers drop off quite a bit when it comes to "openness, communications, and transparency." In those related areas of the relationship, just 69% of shippers are satisfied, and even fewer 3PLs (62%) were positive.

On 3PL side, it seems likely the relatively low number in this area relates to the persistent complaint 3PLs have that shippers will not get "strategic" with them, meaning in part shippers won't share enough of their supply chain plans and strategies, which would enable 3PLs to offer ideas on how they might support those plans.

There is also decent size disconnect relative to perceived flexibility. While a full 98% of 3PLs said their clients expect a high level of flexibility to meet changing needs, a much smaller 68% of shippers believe their 3PLs are sufficiently flexible to meet their needs, down from 72% last year. Our view: shippers, like most customers, just wish they could get their changes almost immediately, and in reality 3PLs take some time to adapt. Whether increasing that 3PL response time in any particular scenario really is possible is the question.

Perhaps surprisingly, the number of shippers reporting that they are involved in gainsharing arrangements with 3PLs declined year over year. This year, 42% of shippers said they were involved in gainsharing arrangements with 3PLs, down from 56% the previous year. Does this represent a true decline in the use of gainsharing, or is it simply a variation in the numbers one often sees in survey data from year to year? Hard to say. The report says the decline might be due to the somewhat improved economic climate, meaning shippers were less interested in reducing outsourcing risk. A multi-year view will be needed to determine if a decline in gainsharing is a real trend.

We also wonder if there was not some statistical "noise" in the data that showed a sharp drop in the number of companies interested in collaborating with others, possibly even competitors, to reduce logistics costs. When this question was asked last year for the first time, 68% of shipper respondents and 80% of 3PLs expressed interest in these strategies. This year these percentages dropped to 44% and 67%, respectively. We find it hard to believe that opinions relative to collaboration really changed that much in a single year, or that only 44% of shippers have an interest in collaboration (who doesn't, in theory?), though perhaps it was the "even with competitors" part that scares some respondents off.

Both these two statistical declines could also be the result of the fact that this year there was a growth in the percent of respondents from smaller companies relative to previous years, and it is possible/likely that smaller companies have less interest in gainsharing and/or collaboration.

The chart below shows what percent of respondents by region use 3PLs for various services. In North America, for example, 66% of shippers use 3PLs for international transportation, as do 65% for both domestic transportation and warehousing/distribution.

 


(Distribution/Materials Handling Story Continues Below)

CATEGORY SPONSOR: LONGBOW ADVANTAGE - JDA SUPPLY CHAIN CONSULTANTS

Download Longbow Advantage

Business Briefs

 

 

The Keys to WMS Success,

Maximizing JDA WMS

Performance and More

 

 

 

 

 

 

Our initial reaction was that there must be some disconnect in the data. If shippers report just 42% of total logistics spend is with 3PLs, that looks inconsistent with these much higher percentages for the main logistics cost components of transportation and distribution. But we believe that can be reconciled by considering that it appears the services question only asks if a shipper is using any 3PLs for this work. In other words, if a company uses a 3PL for inbound transportation only, but not for outbound, then they would answer Yes to this service question, but have just a portion of their transportation spend going to outsourcing.

Also of some note in this chart is that just 7% of respondents in North America report using a lead logistic provider/4PL (an outsourced manager of outsourcers), versus almost double (13%) in Asia.

The survey also found that fuel efficiency and carbon emissions are becoming a more important part of shippers’ 3PL procurement decision processes.

In a featured section on logistics in emerging markets, the report noted many of the challenges in doing business in many of these countries, from lack of infrastructure to challenging tax regimes. To deal with this, as shown in the figure below, the majority of respondents believe the best model for managing outsourcing in emerging markets is to use a global 3PL that in turn manages local 3PLs versus say trying to manage local 3PLs directly.

 

 

The full report can be downloaded for free at 2012 Annual Third Party Logistics Study.

 

Any reaction to the numbers in this year's 3PL study? What other data do you believe would be useful for the survey to explore? Do you see a decline in gainsharing out there? Let us know your thoughts in the Feedback section below.


Recent Feedback

As a UK based Third party logistics organisation we have seen many changes since 2012. Our Ecommerce order fulfilment continues to expand due to the explosion in online purchasing. More importantly, due to the evolving complexity of online trading due to Google's secretivness, shippers are more inclined to talk about their strategic plans but also be willing to listen to advice. With so many clients in the dark regarding the future of e-retail as the technological changes are coming in thick and fast, there is less over-confidence and more communication. Our advice to all shippers and to all 3pls offering warehousing, ecommerce fulfilment and pick and pack services is to be intuitive and spend a good portion of time on research. Many clients were almost left behind with the 40% increase in mobile and iPad/tablet ordering and this was an extrememly costly mistake for those without mobile friendly ecommerce websites.


Barnaby Kirsen
Marketing Dept
Radius Logistics
Sep, 26 2013
 
.