SEARCH searchBY TOPIC
right_division Green SCM Distribution
Bookmark us
sitemap
SCDigest Logo

SCDigest Expert Insight: Supply Chain by Design

About the Author

Dr. Michael Watson, one of the industry’s foremost experts on supply chain network design and advanced analytics, is a columnist and subject matter expert (SME) for Supply Chain Digest.

Dr. Watson, of Northwestern University, was the lead author of the just released book Supply Chain Network Design, co-authored with Sara Lewis, Peter Cacioppi, and Jay Jayaraman, all of IBM. (See Supply Chain Network Design – the Book.)

Prior to his current role at Northwestern, Watson was a key manager in IBM's network optimization group. In addition to his roles at IBM and now at Northwestern, Watson is director of The Optimization and Analytics Group.

By Dr. Michael Watson

January 14, 2014



UPS's Christmas Problem Explained in One Graph

The Problems UPS had with Delivering On-Line Orders in Time for Christmas have Lessons for all Supply Chain Managers


Dr. Watson Says:

start
...if you want a responsive supply chain, you have to build in enough capacity.
close
What Do You Say?



Click Here to Send Us Your Comments
feedback
Click Here to See Reader Feedback


It is now well-known that the surge in last-minute online orders overwhelmed UPS’s delivery system and UPS failed to deliver products when promised and on-time for Christmas.  I’m sure that many more articles will be written that discuss the specifics of what went wrong for UPS.

But, in this article, I’m interested in explaining what went wrong in one general graph and then using that graph to draw lessons for the supply chain. 

Borrowing from queuing theory, the excellent book Factory Physics tells us that as any system approaches 100% capacity utilization, the cycle time (the time to clear all the orders) grows in a highly non-linear fashion (or, in other words, conditions deteriorate very fast and orders become very late). 

The following graph illustrates the point.


Previous Columns by Dr. Watson

The Three Use Cases for Data Scientists

Learn Python, PuLP, Jupyter Notebooks, and Network Design

EOQ Model and the Hidden Costs of Fixed Costs

CSCMP Edge - Nike Quote: "It is All an Art Project Until you Get it on Someone's Feet"

Supply Chain by Design: Why Business Leaders should think of AI as an Umbrella Term

More

This is what happened to UPS.  They planned on a certain amount of capacity.  Then, when demand was much higher than anticipated, it swamped available capacity and made for a lot of late orders, unhappy customers, and unwanted publicity.

This same graph applies to every supply chain.  As you approach 100% capacity utilization, you can expect very long cycle times.  Without spare capacity, any variability (in demand or in supply) will cause cycle times to continue to grow. 

Also, as you can see by the graph, you may not get much warning of a potential problem.  You can see this with traffic on a highway.  Even some heavy traffic can seem to move pretty fast (this is 80% capacity utilization), but by the time you get to 95% capacity utilization on the roads, the travel times become unbearable. 

If you want to create a responsive supply chain, you have to build in enough capacity.  The late Don Frey (who I was lucky enough to have as an advisor) used to say that if you wanted a responsive supply chain, just build another production line.  In other words, he was saying that instead of building your capacity to match demand, you should have a lot more capacity—and therefore move the left of the above curve.

This graph also explains why supply chain design can be so difficult.  If you don’t have enough capacity, you will have angry customers with late orders.  If you have enough capacity to ensure responsiveness, then you may have angry investors who think you are wasting money.

Final Thoughts:

The idea presented here is related to the article on the three types of buffers in a supply chain.  Of course, UPS couldn’t buffer the excess demand with inventory (they can’t deliver before you order) and so they were stuck with time being their buffer.


 

Recent Feedback

 

No Feedback on this article yet

 

 
.