Expert Insight: Gilmore's Daily Jab
By Dan Gilmore
Date: Nov. 12, 2008

Supply Chain Comment: Is There Anything More Pathetic than the GM Situation? And that’s a Shame

 

Supply Chain Cost Structure Simply Unsustainable

This post is only loosely related to supply chain, but the death spiral of GM, Chrysler, and I think to a somewhat lesser extent Ford is certainly sad to watch.

How many years has it been going on now? All three were losing big dough even in the relatively good times of the past few years. Then came high gas prices, which killed sales of highly profitable SUVs and trucks, and they are now in deep, deep trouble with the credit crisis, which hits auto companies as bad as the home builders, and the recession.

What is just hard to really grasp is the scope of the cost structure that GM and the others built. I mean, with US automakers in a multi-year decline, they are still paying hundreds of millions or maybe even billions per year for the idle workers playing cards in the “jobs bank.”

The health care costs were staggering. The cost per vehicle to GM for retiree health care costs, not even current employees, was said to be $1400. That was before it shed many of those costs with the union agreement in 2007 that put the UAW in charge of retiree health care – after GM seeded the program with $50 billion.

$1400 per car; hundreds of millions to job bank workers; $50 billion in seed money for health care. It’s almost like it was surreal, if you really stopped to look at it.

Word also came today that parts maker Delphi, the unit GM spun off a few years ago and which has been in bankruptcy for three years now, received $5.69 billion from GM in the third quarter. The funds came in the form of cash as well as GM's assumption of certain unfunded pension liabilities for Delphi's work force, all related to terms of the original spin off. Now a deal is a deal, but $5.69 billion more out the door in GM’s current condition?

This is no way to run a railroad. 

Yes, the US OEMs need to design cars customers want to buy and all that, but the cost structure and financial position GM, Ford and Chrysler put themselves in for the future when times were good is just hard to comprehend. 

The pain of strikes and labor strife is very real and understandably to be avoided, but not at all costs, it should seem clear now. I am also happy to see autoworkers make a good living, as they do at Toyota and Honda. But the legacy cost structure for GM is just insane.

The airlines used bankruptcy to bail themselves out of much of these legacy and structural costs. The OEMs want to avoid that path, especially Ford, as a lot of the Ford family’s wealth is in Ford stock, which would be wiped out in bankruptcy. A government bail out of some kind is almost assured.

Will that help? Who knows.

The whole thing boggles the mind.

I’d love your thoughts on this.


Send an Email
profile About the Author
Dan Gilmore is the editor of Supply Chain Digest.
 

Gilmore Says:


The cost structure and financial position GM, Ford and Chrysler put themselves in for the future when times were good is just hard to comprehend.


What Do You Say?
Click Here to Send Us
Your Comments
views
 
profile Related Blogs
Product Review: Supply Chain Planning Solutions

ProMat 2019: The New Era of Mobile Robots in Distribution

Supply Chain Comment: The Top Supply Chain Innovations of All-Time

Supply Chain Comment: Did Walmart's Failed Case Tagging Program Set RFID Back or Move it Forward?

In Modest Surprise, JDA Brings In New CEO Girish Rishi to Run Industry's Largest Supply Chain Software Firm

Remembering Supply Chain Executive Ken Miesemer

A Few Thoughts on the Christmas Supply Chain 2015

Supply Chain Comment: Still Lots of Different Bar Code Labels on HP Printer

Dimensional Weighting Programs by Parcel Carriers Can Raise Costs Substantially, but Shippers have Options for Minimizing the Impact

Supply Chain Jab: Burpee Seeds and Parcel Logistics

<< Previous | Next >>

See all posts
.