Batts says that is simply the result of middlemen being very good at playing off carriers, desperate for business, against each other even more than usual – and pocketing some of the profit for themselves. She says, however, that something isn’t right in that equation.
“All I can say is something is wrong….when the carriers who actually own the assets are not being rewarded for the associated risks, and the companies that have no asset risks really are seeing their margins rise,” she says.
Gene Tyndall, Executive Vice President at Tompkins Associates and former executive at a major LSP, isn’t surprised at this – and says it comes with the territory.
“Yes, there is something that can be considered unfair about an LSP increasing its transportation management margins at the expense of the motor carriers,” he told SCDigest. “However, especially during this severe downturn, it is in everyone's best interest -- including the consumer -- to work toward lower prices for goods and services. The LSP margin is an effect of its obtaining reduced rates, not a cause; and lower freight rates should translate into a net benefit to the overall economy. Asset owners have to live with supply-demand imbalances all the time, it comes with the industry."
Carriers Think We Have Hit Bottom
Truckload rates obviously have been declining precipitously, with many saying some carriers are accepting loads at rates below variable costs. In a recent survey of some 150 truckload carriers conducted by Transport Capital Partners, for example, none of the carriers said their rates had increased in the past three months. The survey found 15% of the carriers said that their rates have remained the same, but 50% or more have seen at least a 5% decrease in their rates. 49% saw a decline of 5%, 23% saw of decline of 10%, and 12% saw a decline of 15% or more in the last three months, according to Batts.
Interestingly, the survey found a much higher percentage (24%) of small carriers (under $25 million) said their rates had remained at least flat, versus just 10% of the larger carriers – which Batts says is probably related to smaller carriers, in many cases, operating in more protected, regional lanes.
The smaller carriers are “trying to keep themselves hidden from the big guys, but it probably is also another reason why you’re seeing more of the large, long-haul carriers trying to move in to the regional markets,” Batts says.
All told, a rising percentage of carriers (over 50%) at least now believe rates will remain constant over the next 12 months, versus the darkest days of last November, when just 30% felt that way.
Still, constant rates at these levels won’t do much to get carriers healthy again.
“I don’t need rates to stabilize, I need them to increase,” the CEO of one TL carrier told SCDigest recently. “We are losing money at these rates.”
Can we possibly go any lower in truckload freight rates? Do you expect we will see any sort of increase needed to cover carrier costs, or is the demand so low that is unlikely in the next year? How much of a factor has supply chain and packaging redesign been in the volume drops, versus the recession? Let us know your thoughts at the Feedback button below.
SCDigest is Twittering!
Follow us now at https://twitter.com/scdigest