SEARCH searchBY TOPIC
right_division Green SCM Distribution
Bookmark us
sitemap
SCDigest Logo
distribution

Focus: Sourcing/Procurement: Feature Article from Our Sourcing and Procurement Subject Area - See All

From SCDigest's On-Target e-Magazine

- Dec. 2, 2015 -

 
Supply Chain News: Consultants all Seem to Agree, Top Performing Procurement Organization Deliver a Lot More than the Average One

How Results are Calculated not Clear, but Four Different Studies Show Big Variance on Returns from Procurement Based on Skill Levels

 

SDigest Editorial Staff 

 

In supply chain, it often seems very hard to measure just how well supply chain organizations are performing compared to others, in quantitative terms at least.

There seems to be less of that kind of challenge in analyzing the contributions that excellence specifically in procurement, for whatever reason, at least according to analysis by a number of major consulting and research firms.

SCDigest Says:

start

In none of these four examples is it very clear how the savings/value difference were calculated across different caliber companies/managers in terms of procurement excellence, but the results are almost identical.

close
What Do You Say?
Click Here to Send Us Your Comments
feedback
Click Here to See Reader Feedback

First, the analysts over at CEB have been saying for some time that there is big value in procurement managers who can think and act strategically, versus their peers that are more tactically oriented.

"Strategic procurement employees generate nearly six times as many savings as those who are not as strategic," CEB has written, based on research across its corporate client base.

CEB defines the difference between the two types of managers at a high level. For example, it says tactical-oriented procurement managers focus primarily on straight cost cuts from suppliers, while more strategic managers pursue a wider variety of opportunities, such as supplier collaboration projects or innovation.

Tactical staff view sourcing events in isolation, CEB says, while strategic managers are able to connect the dots between what the business is trying to achieve and how procurement can help.

"And tacticians merely communicate the process they followed and the outcomes they achieved, while strategic staff demonstrate the value of different ideas to the business and help them decide on the best course," CEB adds.

Meanwhile, a major white paper on procurement earlier this year by the consultants at Accenture republished a chart it had developed all the way back in 2007, showing that procurement "masters" saw a return of ten times their investment in the function, versus just four times that investment in low performing procurement organizations, as shown below.

 

Source: Accenture

 

Accenture noted that the data showed that "in short, it paid to be good."


(Sourcing and Procurement Article Continues Below)

CATEGORY SPONSOR: SOFTEON

 

Next, last year the analysts and consultants at The Hackett Group produced the following chart, showing the amount of purchase price savings that procurement leaders generate is more than double that of the average firm.

 

 

Source: The Hackett Group

 

As can be seen, this data says leaders generate some nine dollars of savings for every dollar invested, versus just over four dollars for middling performers.

Not long after that, a combination of AT Kearney, the Institute for Supply Management, and the Chartered Institute of Purchasing and Supply also issued a new report, based on Kearney's Return on Supply Management Assets (ROSMA) methodology for measuring the value of supply management activities.

It contains the following chart, which shows procurement leaders receive a return equal to about 11 times their investment in the function, while the median company (50% level) achieves a return of just 4.5 on those dollars. The worst companies barely get any return at all, seeing payback equal to less than their investment, at a ratio of just .8.

 

 

Source: ATKearney

 

These last two sets of numbers measure slightly different things, but are remarkably similar in their main takeaways: procurement leaders simply drive considerably more value from what they spend on procurement than the average company, probably more than twice as much.

 

So there you have it. In none of these four examples is it very clear how the savings/value difference were calculated across different caliber companies/managers in terms of procurement excellence, but the results across them are almost identical.

 

The trick, of course, is understanding where your company stands along these lines. We also continue to ponder if there might be some way to apply this same type of methodology to the broader supply chain, but no manageable approach has yet come to us.

 

Do you think these various analyses showing the huge advantage top tier procurement organizations and managers have over others are right? Can you see anyway of doing this for the broader supply chain? Let us know your thoughts at the Feedback button (email) or section (web form) below.



Recent Feedback

 

No Feedback on this article yet

 

 
.