SupplyChainDigest
Editorial Staff
John Clarke, chief technology officer at Tesco, gave a refreshingly
straightforward presentation on their RFID experiences, and
shared directly with SupplyChainDigest his thoughtful responses
to some of our questions on the state of the RFID universe.
It was bullish without ignoring the current real challenges,
and recognized this was going to take some time.
Tesco is one of the world’s top five largest retailers,
with multiple store formats including grocery, hypermarkets,
and convenience.
Clarke noted that before they thought about making suppliers
begin tagging, they first wanted to gain real-world experience
themselves, and so began a couple of internal pilots, such
as an EPC-based track and trace applications for trays/totes
of high-value-items (e.g., batteries) from DC to store.
When conducting initial pilots with suppliers, they also
wanted to get multiple perspectives, and so in the initial
group of 20 vendors, they included a mix of very large companies
along with mid-sized and even smaller suppliers, to better
understand the likely issues and challenges across the entire
supplier base.
They describe RFID as “radio bar codes,” important
terminology, as it suggests to internal staff and suppliers,
a natural transition from the widespread use of traditional
bar codes to something similar, but better. This is notably
in contrast to the admonitions we frequently heard early
on (much less common now), that companies using RFID as just
a “bar code replacement” were somehow misguided.
Tesco puts RFID (and all new technology) through three filters:
Is it better for the customer? Does it make life simpler
for their employees? Does it lower operating costs? Clarke
believes that RFID will positively impact all three areas,
though he noted there were still many challenges, and that
their current efforts are really to gain learnings, not to
roll-out a full program yet. Key is to really determine how
to change business processes, such as replenishment, and
how to use RFID information effectively. Tesco is working
selectively with suppliers at the SKU-specific levels, as
it believes that returns will vary substantially by vendors
and SKU types.
We caught up with Clarke after his presentation, and asked
him whether RFID was really needed to re-engineer supply
chain processes - couldn’t some of them be improved
without using RFID at all?
“Well, you’re absolutely right,” Clarke
told SCDigest. “However, given where we are at today,
if you are going to re-engineer supply chain processes, you’d
be crazy not to include RFID as at least part of that design.” While
he recognizes there are still many challenges, including
some specific to Europe and its regulations around reader
protocols, in general “RFID prices are going down,
benefits are going up, performance is improving, and customers
like what they see,” Clarke told us.
We’ll note, however, that Mike Bargmann, chief logistics
officer at Wegmans Food Markets, in his panel presentation
noted that Wegmans is looking at re-engineering many supply
chain process now, before they believe EPC is fully ready: “There
are many areas where we don’t need RFID technology
to change those processes, though it could add further improvement
later,” Bargmann said.
Do we need more straight talk from early adopters about
what’s really happening with their programs? What’s
the right way to think about RFID and supply chain process
design right now? Let us know your thoughts.
|