SCDigest Editorial Staff
SCDigest Says: |
As the report notes, many, if not most, companies do not pay greater attention to reverse logistics issues because they don’t well understand the true costs or potential benefits from improvement.
What do you say? Send us your comments here |
Many commentators and industry professionals have been promoting for years that it is time most companies paid greater attention to reverse logistics processes. For the most part, however, reverse logistics has occupied a very low place on the logistics priority list.
That is starting to change, driven in part by the connection between reverse logistics and green supply chain initiatives, growing regulation regarding disposal of hazardous materials and other areas that impact reverse logistics processes, and recognition by companies that there are, in fact, significant dollars to be saved by greater attention to reverse logistics issues. (See Logistics in Reverse Gear; also view our on-demand videocast Building an ROI for Reverse Logistics).
Two industry organizations – APQC and WERC - have recently partnered to do an in-depth analysis of reverse logistics best practices, published in a new report titled Reverse Logistics: Backward Practices that Matter. The research was performed by analysis of two 3PLs specializing in reverse logistics, as well as the reverse logistics practices of McKesson and Raytheon.
The full report must be purchased, but an executive summary listing of the 12 best practices is available for free from the APQC web site (see Reverse Logistics Best Practices Executive Summary).
|