Distribution and Materials Handling FocusGetting it Done in the DC, Every Day  
 
 

April 6 , 2010 -

 

Logistics News: Wearable RF Devices Gaining interest as Hands-Free Option; OHL Finds 10% Gain even over Voice

Significant Improvements in Durability over Older Units; Often Plug and Play in Replacing Handheld Terminals



   
 


Cliff Holste, Materials Handling Editor

 
SCDigest Says:
 

Ulery noted that the wearables have held up very well, and may actually suffer less damage than handhelds since users don’t put them down, drop them on the floor, etc..


Click Here to See Reader Feedback

The hands-free benefits of voice technology have led to the tremendous growth in recent years in interest in and adoption of voice-based solutions in distribution applications.

 

But there is a hands-free alternative to voice that is also getting a stronger look: “wearable” terminals that are generally word on an operator’s arm, giving him or her availability of hands to use for picking or other tasks without the need to put a traditional handheld terminal down.

 

SCDigest believes logistics and distribution managers should often include wearables in the mix when looking for hands-free systems, and recognize that it is possible to deploy wearables with voice capabilities built in for multi-modal applications.

 

In a recent Videocast on Supply Chain Digest and the Supply Chain Television Channel, Robert Ulery, former director of engineering at logistics service provider OHL (who has since accepted a position with Johnson Stephens Consulting), said that OHL’s implementation of wearable devices (from Motorola) delivered significant productivity gains over the handhelds devices they had been using – and perhaps surprisingly, some improvement over voice terminals as well.

 

(To see the full videocast, go to: The Rise of Wearables in Distribution Applications.)

 

Ulery did engineering studies to measure the impact of moving from traditional handheld terminals in picking operations to the wearables, and found a 25% gain in piece picking and a 20% gain in case picking, consistent with a pilot project before implementation.

 

“We had a pretty neat opportunity here where we were able to test with a stop watch and engineered standards both the old way of doing it with the handhelds and the new way with the wearables,” Ulery said. “We did it in the same environment, with the same pick layout, same people, same products.”

 

The improvements over use of handhelds is not surprising for several reasons, Ulery said. The videocast, for example,  shows several lives scenes of OHL order pickers using both the wearables and the traditional handhelds, and clearly illustrates the benefits of having both hands available to pick multiple items, open cases, move cases into the pick position, and other tasks required during the picking process (see picture from videocast below).

 

The improvement over voice technology, which OHL was also using in some of its DCs, was perhaps more surprising. During the Q&A following the broadcast, Ulery said he attributed the 10% improvement using wearables to the fact that operators sometimes had to wait a bit for the next voice prompt to come, and/or to have the voice command repeated if they were unable to understand it the first time due to DC noise or other factors.

 

Plug and Play Implementation

 

Ulery said that while the opportunity to improve productivity over the existing handhelds was the main driver behind the replacement project, the fact that in their case, literally no IT resources were required for the project helped speed it along internally.

 

 

(Distribution Article - Continued Below)

 
     
 
CATEGORY SPONSOR: LONGBOW ADVANTAGE - JDA SUPPLY CHAIN CONSULTANTS

Download Longbow Advantage

Business Briefs

 

 

The Keys to WMS Success,

Maximizing JDA WMS

Performance and More

 

 

 

 

 

 
     
     
 


Since they were already using the handheld RF terminals, OHL simply used the same terminal emulation for the wearables, making it virtually plug and play. OHL did make just a couple of minor tweaks to the wearable screen layout with the help of Quest Solution, a wireless systems integrator and Motorola reseller.

 

Mark Wheeler, director of industry solutions at Motorola, said that if the application “involves just matter of moving a set of existing RF transactions from a handheld or truck mount terminal to a wearable, that is pretty straight forward,” but obviously moving from say paper-based picking to a wearable may involve some more effort on the WMS or terminal side.

 

However, he noted that the swap for existing terminals is usually so straightforward it usually makes it easy to do some basic testing with one or two wearables in a DC to evaluate the productivity results, ergonomics and other issues.

 

Wheeler added that current wearable offerings are a whole new generation of devices that have been substantially ruggedized over early models (dating back to the mid-1990s, when companies such as UPS and McKesson deployed thousands of the units), incorporating new materials, new scanner options, and other features that make them more attractive today.

 

Ulery noted that the wearables have held up very well, and may actually suffer less damage than handhelds since users don’t put them down, drop them on the floor, etc.

 

Do you have experience with wearables? What have you found? What are the voice/wearable trade-offs? Let us know your thoughts at the Feedback button below.

 

SCDigest is Twittering!

Follow us now at https://twitter.com/scdigest

 

 

 
     
Send an Email
     
     
.