SEARCH searchBY TOPIC
right_division Green SCM Distribution
Bookmark us
sitemap
SCDigest Logo
distribution

Focus: Manufacturing

Feature Article from Our Manufacturing Subject Area - See All

From SCDigest's On-Target E-Magazine

- March 19, 2014 -

 
Supply Chain News: It's not Over Until It's Over, as NLRB Reviewing Circumstances of Failed Union Vote at Volkswagen Factory in Tennessee

 

Situation getting More Complicated, but Order for New Vote, if it Comes, Likely Months Off

 

SCDigest Editorial Staff

 

Labor groups were dismayed last month when workers at the new assembly plant of German automaker Volkswagen in Chattanooga voted again at forming a union there, despite Volkswagen's apparent support of the move. That left the United Auto Workers union reeling after the defeat, where a victory was seen as key to its "Southern strategy" of organizing the plants of foreign automakers on US soil, none of which is unionized currently (see Volkswagen Plant in Chattanooga Votes Against UAW).

 

SCDigest Says:

start

If the UAW were to also lose a new election in Chattanooga, it might actually set back its Southern strategy even further than would a plan to regroup and find another target at some future point.

close
What Do You Say?
Click Here to Send Us Your Comments
feedback
Click Here to See Reader Feedback

But maybe it's not over in Chattanooga yet.

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) says it will review a complaint from the UAW claiming that interference by Republican lawmakers and others prompted workers there to reject union representation. The UAW is asking the NLRB to order a new vote.

The UAW has filed an election objection with the NLRB alleging that Republican politicians conducted "a coordinated and widely-publicized coercive campaign" to deprive "workers of their federally-protected right" to "support and select the UAW as their exclusive representative." The union says intimidation by third parties should void the results based on the constitutionally shaky doctrine known as "laboratory conditions."

In this case, the UAW is focusing on the actions and words of politicians. Specifically, Tennessee Senator Bob Corker at one point claimed that he was "assured" that Chattanooga would be rewarded with a second production line if workers rejected the union.

The Senator's "threat was made using United States Government resources," the union complains to the NLRB, and "we believe that Senator Corker used government travel funds specifically to fly to Chattanooga to make his threat in the most open and notorious manner."

However, Volkswagen immediately disavowed Corker's claim. UAW regional director Gary Casteel also assured Chattanooga workers prior to the election that Volkswagen officials "specifically said that this vote will have no bearing on the decision of where to place the new product."

Of course, this NLRB, the majority of which are Democrats, has been especially aggressive in supporting labor's views, perhaps most notably its move to sue Boeing in 2011 alleging the aerospace giant illegal moved production for thew new 787 jet from the Seattle area to a non-union plant in South Carolina. That almost kept the new factory from opening up, but became a moot point not long after when Boeing and it union workers reached an agreement that dropped the new factory as an issue.

Many observers thought that NRLB move was an abuse of its historic role in managing union votes and arbitrating labor issues.

So, while the authority of the NLRB to order a new vote at Volkswagen under these circumstances seems tenuous at best, that doesn't mean such a move won't be made.

(Manufacturing Article Continued Below)

CATEGORY SPONSOR: SOFTEON

 
 

If the NRLB rules that way, "it would be an unprecedented assault on free speech," Sen Corker wrote in a recent op-ed piece in the Wall Street Journal. "In every similar case where a company has remained neutral in a union-election drive, members of Congress on both sides of the aisle have voiced their opinions. The NLRB has ruled repeatedly that public officials have the right to make statements taking sides in a union election, and that those statements do not justify overturning the outcome of that election."

He added that "The nation will be watching this ruling closely."

However, the possibility of a new vote is not without risk to the UAW as well. If it were to also lose a new election in Chattanooga, it might actually set back its Southern strategy even further than would a plan to regroup and find another target at some future point.

Further complicating matters, a group of Volkswagen workers, backed by anti-union organizations, have also filed suit, saying that the UAW move to force a new election is itself beyond the law. Surprising to some, the NRLB just ruled that if the NLRB decides to hold a hearing on the dispute, the anti-UAW workers will be able to take part and state their case, along with the UAW.

All this means that that the Atlanta regional office's determination in the Volkswagen case "is a couple of months off. And it could take a lot longer than that," according to comments by former NLRB General Counsel Fred Feinstein this week.

This is a just one element of an on-going war between the UAW and foreign automakers that is likely to play out over many years.

Do you think the NLRB should order a new vote at the Volkswagen plant?
Let us know your thoughts at the Feedback section below.

Recent Feedback

 

No Feedback on this article yet

 

 
.
.